Emilio Gomez vs Marcos Lee Chan Baratau Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L L L
Form
L L L L L L L W L LHead-2-Head: Gomez 1 - 0 Baratau
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gomez winning 2 and Baratau winning 0. The last match between Gomez and Baratau was at the Santa Fe Challenger, 02-06-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Emilio Gomez getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Gomez | 1 |
| Marcos Lee Chan Baratau | 0 |
Santa Fe Challenger(02-06-2024)
6
1
6
1
| Gomez | Stats | Baratau |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 756 | Ranking | N/A |
| 90 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 33 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (427-330) | Career Total W/L | 38% (18-29) |
| $571,180 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Emilio Gomez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:52:30 | Average Match Time | 0:52:30 |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24/39) |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 90% (9/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (3/15) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (24/39) | Return Points Win % | 24% (10/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emilio Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Emilio Gomez
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Emilio Gomez
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas Godsick
Player
Emilio Gomez
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Emilio Gomez
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Emilio Gomez
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Emilio Gomez
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Bautista Vilicich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Emilio Gomez
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Enzo Camargo Lima
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Suarez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yubel Ubri
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Perez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Torrealba
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Dellien
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (427/330) | Win/Loss | 38% (18/29) |
| 55% (978/787) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (41/63) |
| 52% (8718/8082) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (440/535) |
| 61% (216/136) | Hard Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) |
| 53% (176/155) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 13% (1/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1861 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1946 | Total Double Faults | 59 |
| 1:17:42 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 495.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.68 |
| 60% (25301/42238) | 1st Serve % | 67% (1143/1694) |
| 68% (17304/25301) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (638/1143) |
| 50% (8445/16937) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (239/551) |
| 42% (1738/4098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (62/150) |
| 39% (16431/41644) | Return Points Win % | 38% (621/1617) |
| 43% (15/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (9/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (17/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (18/24) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (236/200) | Challenger W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 67% (132/65) | Futures W/L | 45% (17/21) |
| 56% (413/731) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (18/46) |
| 57% (12/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (141/256) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 50% (114/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 85% (438/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (18/15) |
| 14% (438/63) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (18/3) |
| 16% (319/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (29/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
